Responsible Technology & Claims Policy
Claims should be useful, sourced, and proportionate.
This policy explains how Data Immigrant approaches public claims, technology, evidence, and sustainability-facing communication.
Our standard
We aim to make claims that are specific, contextual, and supported by sources where a source is needed. We avoid presenting aspiration as proof, and we avoid implying direct partnership or endorsement where the relationship is only contextual.
Responsible technology
Technology should make complex systems easier to inspect and understand. In our work, responsible technology means legible interfaces, careful use of data, human-readable explanations, and a clear distinction between evidence, interpretation, and education.
Environmental and sustainability claims
When we discuss labels, food systems, biodiversity, agriculture, or sustainability, we aim to show what a claim can reasonably support and what it cannot prove. We do not use sustainability language as decoration.
Institutional references
References to public institutions, datasets, and European programmes are used to explain context and significance. They should not be read as endorsement, certification, or direct contractual relationship unless explicitly stated.